Dividend Calculator: How Much Passive Income Can You Generate?


With dividend growth, Yield on Cost and DRIP toggle. See how much monthly cash dividend your portfolio produces over time — and how the 2.4% reinvestment gap changes your end wealth.
Dividends are the portion of profits that companies distribute to shareholders. For long-term investors, they are one of the most powerful sources of return — especially when reinvested. Calculate how dividends build your wealth and passive income over time.
Dividends from quality companies. The arvy portfolio holds ~30 hand-picked companies like Nestlé, Visa, Microsoft, RELX and Ferrari — with stable or growing dividends. → View portfolio
⚠ Illustration. Not investment or tax advice. Historical returns are no guarantee of future results. arvy is a FINMA-regulated asset manager. Imprint
The calculator uses total return as its basis — price gains + dividends combined. With 7% total return and 2.5% dividend yield, your wealth grows by 7% per year, of which 2.5% is paid out as a cash dividend. The dividend yield on the current market value stays roughly constant long-term — because as per-share dividends grow, share prices typically grow alongside them.
Dividend growth shows up in a separate metric: Yield on Cost. If per-share dividends grow at 5% per year, they double every 14 years — measured against your original cost basis, you climb from 2.5% YoC in year 1 to 6.6% YoC in year 20. That's the real "compounding effect" of a dividend growth strategy: not the nominal dividend on your current wealth, but what a share you bought 20 years ago is paying out today.
Wealth growth (DRIP on): Wealth grows each year by the full total return. Wealth growth (DRIP off): Wealth grows only by the price-gain portion (total return minus dividend yield), dividend paid out. Yield on Cost: Starting yield × (1 + growth)^years — calculated on the original purchase price. Assumption: monthly contributions, annual compounding. Swiss capital gains tax-free for private investors.
Many investors chase high dividend yields — high-dividend ETFs, telecoms, utilities yielding 5-6%. But a stock with 2% yield and 8% dividend growth beats a stock with 5% yield and 0% growth long-term. After 15 years, the growing stock pays more dividends — and likely has a higher share price too.
Two real-world examples:
| Scenario | Start yield | Growth | YoC Year 15 | YoC Year 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-dividend stock | 5.0% | 0% | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Quality growth | 2.0% | 8% | 6.3% | 13.7% |
| Swiss aristocrat (typical) | 3.0% | 4% | 5.4% | 8.0% |
Yield on Cost calculated on original purchase price. Quality growth overtakes high-dividend by year 13 — and the gap widens exponentially. Source: arvy calculation based on historical dividend growth rates.
A very high dividend yield (>6%) is almost always a warning signal, not a gift. When the share price falls, the yield mathematically rises. A stock at 8% yield can be the result of being cut in half — and the next dividend cut is often just around the corner. Examples: Telecom Italia, Centrica, Vodafone — all once had high dividends, all have drastically cut or eliminated them.
Quality companies in the arvy portfolio offer the opposite combination: moderate starting yield with strong, sustainable growth. Details: Dividends in Switzerland — The Complete Guide and the aristocrat showcase RELX: Low-Uncertainty Dividend Aristocrat.
Yield on Cost measures the current dividend relative to your original purchase price — not the current market price. If you bought a stock for CHF 100 and it now pays CHF 4 in dividends, your YoC is 4%. If the dividend grows to CHF 8 over the years, your YoC is 8% — even though the current dividend yield based on market value may only be 2% (because the price has risen to CHF 400).
That's the magic of holding quality companies long-term. A classic example: Nestlé shares bought 25 years ago at CHF 30 now pay CHF 3.10 dividend per share. Yield on Cost: 10.3%. Yield on current market value (~CHF 80): only 3.9%. An investor who bought in 1999 and held collects over 10% per year today — risk-free, no further capital required.
The DRIP toggle in the calculator looks small — but it represents arguably the single biggest return factor in all of wealth-building math. The J.P. Morgan/FactSet study on the MSCI World from 1970 to 2025 shows four scenarios for the same index, same companies, same timeframe:
| Scenario | Return p.a. | End value (Base 100) |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends received but spent | 7.2% | 4,244 |
| Dividends reinvested in equities | 9.6% | 14,458 |
Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. MSCI World Index, 1970–2025, in USD.
2.4 percentage points per year. A factor of 3.4× over 55 years. The difference between reinvested and spent is 16 times larger than any typical TER difference in ETFs. Yet everyone discusses 0.05% TER differences — nobody discusses the 2.4% reinvestment gap. Full math here: The True Cost of Investing.
That's why arvy uses accumulating share classes — automatic reinvestment of all dividends, no behaviour required. The 2.4% works structurally, not dependent on your discipline.
Housel's core thesis: it's not IQ that makes investors rich, it's behaviour. Anyone looking at this dividend calculator and obsessing over "monthly passive income year 20" misses the deeper trick: 80% of end wealth happens in the last 15 years. Switching DRIP off to "feel something now" destroys exactly that effect. Housel uses the Buffett example: 99% of his wealth came after his 50th birthday.
Swiss tax logic has an unusual asymmetry that affects every dividend strategy:
Consequence: CHF 100 capital gain = CHF 100 in your pocket. CHF 100 dividend = only CHF 65-75 after income tax. In Switzerland, capital gains are more tax-efficient than dividends — a strong argument for reinvestment (instead of distribution) and for quality compounders with lower yield ratios.
For the full tax context: Swiss Tax Progression Calculator — see how your marginal rate changes when dividend income is added.
A "Dividend Aristocrat" is a company that has raised its dividend for at least 25 consecutive years. Swiss examples: Nestlé (25+ years), Roche (35+ years). European examples: RELX (25 years), Wolters Kluwer. US Aristocrats: over 70 companies, many with 50+ year track records (Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson).
S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index: selected by 25+ years of dividend increases — i.e. by quality. Historically, this index has beaten the S&P 500 in 60%+ of years, with substantially lower drawdowns in crises.
High Dividend Yield ETFs: selected by current yield — i.e. often by fallen stocks, stressed business models, and above-average default risk. That's the mechanism of the "dividend trap."
Rule of thumb: the payout ratio (dividend ÷ profit) is the most important early indicator. Below 60% is healthy, 60-80% acceptable, above 80% risky. Nestlé was at ~88% in 2025 — a warning signal that explains the recent thin increases (+1.64% in 2025). Anyone running a dividend strategy should watch payout ratios as carefully as yields themselves.
| Scenario | Start | Monthly | Total Return | Yield/Growth | Wealth Y20 | Div. Y20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swiss SMI investor | CHF 50k | CHF 500 | 6% | 3% / 3% | CHF 394k | CHF 11,800 |
| arvy Quality Portfolio | CHF 50k | CHF 500 | 8% | 2% / 6% | CHF 530k | CHF 10,600 |
| High-dividend strategy | CHF 50k | CHF 500 | 5% | 5% / 0% | CHF 341k | CHF 17,000 |
DRIP enabled. Illustration. Quality portfolio has lower absolute dividend but higher end wealth — and Yield on Cost grows to 6.4% in year 20 (vs. 5.4% for SMI and 5.0% for high-dividend strategy). Source: arvy calculation.
The quality strategy produces a slightly lower absolute dividend after year 20, but end wealth is 55% higher than the high-dividend strategy and 34% higher than the classic SMI investor. Over 30 years, the gap grows exponentially — because the higher total-return wealth keeps compounding, while the high-dividend strategy structurally fights against mathematical drift.
The SMI has an average dividend yield of ~3-3.5%. Swiss Blue Chips like Nestlé (~3%), Roche (~3.5%) and Novartis (~3.4%) shape this average. Quality portfolios with growth focus (e.g. arvy): ~2-2.5%. High-dividend ETFs: 4-5%. MSCI World: ~1.7-2%.
At 2.5% dividend yield: about CHF 2,500/year gross, or CHF 208/month. At 3% (typical Swiss Blue Chips): CHF 3,000/year. At 4% (high-dividend): CHF 4,000. After Swiss income tax (marginal rate ~25-30%): ~CHF 1,750-2,250 net at 2.5% yield. Use the calculator with your own starting capital for a personalised result.
Reinvest. The J.P. Morgan/FactSet study shows: 2.4 percentage points return difference per year between reinvested and spent — over 55 years a factor of 3.4×. Only in the withdrawal phase (pension, FIRE) does taking dividends make sense. In the accumulation phase: always DRIP on. → The True Cost of Investing — Reinvestment Gap
Fully as income, at your marginal rate (25-37% depending on canton and income). 35% withholding tax is automatically deducted on Swiss dividends — fully reclaimable via correct tax declaration. Capital gains, by contrast, are tax-free in Switzerland. → Dividends in Switzerland Guide — Tax details
Dividend Yield = current dividend ÷ current price. Yield on Cost = current dividend ÷ original purchase price. With a quality company growing its dividend, YoC climbs dramatically over the years — while the "market yield" stays constant because the share price rises proportionally. Example Nestlé: ~3.9% market yield today, but for someone who bought in 1999: over 10% YoC.
Rarely. A very high dividend yield (>6%) is usually a warning signal — share price has fallen, business model is stressed, dividend cut is often coming. Studies show: the "quality-growth" cluster (moderate yield, high growth) beats the "high-yield" cluster long-term in both total return and drawdown behaviour. → The Perfect Company Pays No Dividends (Weekly)
A company that has raised its dividend for at least 25 consecutive years. Swiss examples: Nestlé, Roche. European: RELX, Wolters Kluwer. US Aristocrats: over 70 companies, many with 50+ year track records. Aristocrats indices have historically beaten the broad market in 60%+ of years — with lower drawdowns in crises.
Swiss companies typically pay once a year following the annual general meeting in March-May. Unlike US companies, which pay quarterly (4× per year). Some Swiss firms like LafargeHolcim have experimented with semi-annual payments. In a globally diversified portfolio, dividends flow in spread across the year.
Distributing funds pay dividends to you (1-4× per year). Accumulating funds automatically reinvest them inside the fund — that's the better mode for the accumulation phase, because you structurally close the 2.4% reinvestment gap (no discipline required). Tax treatment identical in Switzerland: both are taxed. arvy uses accumulating share classes.
Yes — that's the "Dividend FIRE" strategy. Rule of thumb: 25× your annual expenses in dividend-generating wealth — at 4% yield, dividends alone cover living costs without selling principal. At CHF 5,000/month expenses: ~CHF 1.5M wealth needed. Use the FIRE Calculator for your target number.
Invest in companies with stable, growing dividends. From CHF 1/month. Accumulating share classes — the 2.4% works automatically.
Set up a savings plan